↓ Skip to main content

Variations in risk and protective factors for life satisfaction and mental wellbeing with deprivation: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variations in risk and protective factors for life satisfaction and mental wellbeing with deprivation: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A Bellis, Helen Lowey, Karen Hughes, Lynn Deacon, Jude Stansfield, Clare Perkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Psychology 15 14%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,414,253
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,819
of 14,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,717
of 164,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#142
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.