| Title |
Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01011-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahmir H. Ali, Joshua Foreman, Ariadna Capasso, Abbey M. Jones, Yesim Tozan, Ralph J. DiClemente |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 440 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 93 | 21% |
| Unknown | 140 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 28 | 6% |
| Psychology | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 95 | 22% |
| Unknown | 157 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,867,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#239
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,692
of 423,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#12
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.