| Title |
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: a protocol for a living systematic review with network meta-analysis including individual patient data (The LIVING Project)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01371-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Juul, Niklas Nielsen, Peter Bentzer, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Lehana Thabane, Adam Linder, Sarah Klingenberg, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 70% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,148,071
of 25,123,315 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#346
of 2,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,821
of 388,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.