↓ Skip to main content

Physiologic perfusion monitoring methods during endovascular revascularization for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease: protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiologic perfusion monitoring methods during endovascular revascularization for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease: protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01357-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Rockley, Prasad Jetty, George Wells

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 14 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,860,442
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,138
of 382,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#37
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.