You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00479-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Bailey, Charlotte Mühlmann, Simon Rice, Maja Nedeljkovic, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Lasse Sander, Alison L. Calear, Philip J. Batterham, Jo Robinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 100 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 101 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,396,539
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#446
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,751
of 424,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.