You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapeutic effects of maximal strength training on walking efficiency in patients with schizophrenia – a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jørn Heggelund, Gunnar Morken, Jan Helgerud, Geir E Nilsberg, Jan Hoff |
| Abstract |
Patients with schizophrenia frequently have disabling gait deficits. The net mechanical efficiency of walking (ϵnet) is an accurate measure often used to evaluate walking performance. Patients with gait deficits have a reduced ϵnet with excessive energy expenditure during sub-maximal walking. Maximal strength training (MST) improves ϵnet in healthy individuals and is associated with reduced risk of mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate whether MST improves ϵnet in patients with schizophrenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,269
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,733
of 178,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#72
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.