You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing without guidelines, learning at the coalface: a case study of health promoters in an era of community health workers in South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00561-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teurai Rwafa-Ponela, John Eyles, Nicola Christofides, Jane Goudge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,060,974
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,149
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,100
of 387,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#38
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.