| Title |
A step towards gender equity to strengthen the pharmaceutical workforce during COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-020-00215-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Bukhari, Mehr Manzoor, Huma Rasheed, Bismah Nayyer, Madeeha Malik, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 33% |
| Pakistan | 8 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Scientists | 10 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,001,736
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#14
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,986
of 421,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.