You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Neuron tau-targeting biomimetic nanoparticles for curcumin delivery to delay progression of Alzheimer’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-020-00626-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunhong Gao, Xiaoyang Chu, Wei Gong, Jinpeng Zheng, Xiangyang Xie, Yuli Wang, Meiyan Yang, Zhiping Li, Chunsheng Gao, Yang Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,526,286
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#128
of 1,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,186
of 391,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.