You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02889-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annika Reintam Blaser, Jean-Charles Preiser, Sonja Fruhwald, Alexander Wilmer, Jan Wernerman, Carina Benstoem, Michael P. Casaer, Joel Starkopf, Arthur van Zanten, Olav Rooyackers, Stephan M. Jakob, Cecilia I. Loudet, Danielle E. Bear, Gunnar Elke, Matthias Kott, Ingmar Lautenschläger, Jörn Schäper, Jan Gunst, Christian Stoppe, Leda Nobile, Valentin Fuhrmann, Mette M. Berger, Heleen M. Oudemans-van Straaten, Yaseen M. Arabi, Adam M. Deane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 69 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,115,346
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,876
of 6,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,677
of 423,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#73
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.