You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors of melanoma cell lines BRAF V600E-mutated
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02350-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muna Al Hashmi, Konduru S. Sastry, Lee Silcock, Lotfi Chouchane, Valentina Mattei, Nicola James, Rebecca Mathew, Davide Bedognetti, Valeria De Giorgi, Daniela Murtas, Wei Liu, Aouatef Chouchane, Ramzi Temanni, Barbara Seliger, Ena Wang, Francesco M. Marincola, Sara Tomei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,060,974
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,796
of 4,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,889
of 385,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#50
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.