| Title |
Prolonged prone position ventilation for SARS-CoV-2 patients is feasible and effective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02956-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Carsetti, Agnese Damia Paciarini, Benedetto Marini, Simona Pantanetti, Erica Adrario, Abele Donati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 352 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 22% |
| Unknown | 114 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 116 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,349,078
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,155
of 6,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,159
of 422,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#47
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.