You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving diagnostic performance of the Kato-Katz method for Clonorchis sinensis infection through multiple samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-019-3594-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Men-Bao Qian, Shi-Feng Zhuang, Shi-Qiao Zhu, Xiao-Mao Deng, Zheng-Xiang Li, Xiao-Nong Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,362,353
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,765
of 5,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,436
of 346,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#38
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.