You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COST Action ‘ImpARAS’: what have we learnt to improve food allergy risk assessment. A summary of a 4 year networking consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-020-00318-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kitty Verhoeckx, Katrine Lindholm Bøgh, Anne Constable, Michelle M. Epstein, Karin Hoffmann Sommergruber, Thomas Holzhauser, Geert Houben, Annette Kuehn, Erwin Roggen, Liam O’Mahony, Ben Remington, René Crevel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 13% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Jordan | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,041,194
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#187
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,963
of 393,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.