You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping global evidence on strategies and interventions in neurotrauma and road traffic collisions prevention: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01348-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santhani M Selveindran, Tamara Tango, Muhammad Mukhtar Khan, Daniel Martin Simadibrata, Peter J. A. Hutchinson, Carol Brayne, Christine Hill, Franco Servadei, Angelos G. Kolias, Andres M. Rubiano, Alexis J. Joannides, Hamisi K. Shabani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Portugal | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,193,091
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#595
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,996
of 393,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.