↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-10-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra D Anderson, Brett Charlton, John M Weiler, Sara Nichols, Sheldon L Spector, David S Pearlman, A305 Study Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,092,197
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,582
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,411
of 184,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.