You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of primary HPV-DNA testing in relation to visual inspection methods for cervical cancer screening in rural China: an epidemiologic and cost-effectiveness modelling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-239 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ju-Fang Shi, Karen Canfell, Jie-Bin Lew, Fang-Hui Zhao, Rosa Legood, Yan Ning, Leonardo Simonella, Li Ma, Yoon-Jung Kang, Yong-Zhen Zhang, Megan A Smith, Jun-Feng Chen, Xiang-Xian Feng, You-Lin Qiao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,069
of 8,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,288
of 113,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#34
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.