↓ Skip to main content

Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Blencowe, Simon Cousens, Luke C Mullany, Anne CC Lee, Kate Kerber, Steve Wall, Gary L Darmstadt, Joy E Lawn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 396 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 19%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 36 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Other 84 21%
Unknown 89 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 40%
Social Sciences 41 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Environmental Science 9 2%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 91 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,055,441
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,718
of 17,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,880
of 120,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.