↓ Skip to main content

A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A structured framework for improving outbreak investigation audits
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig B Dalton, Tony D Merritt, David N Durrheim, Sally A Munnoch, Martyn D Kirk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Master 5 22%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,911
of 14,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,339
of 163,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.