You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-11-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Vallely, Shelley Lees, Charles Shagi, Stella Kasindi, Selephina Soteli, Natujwa Kavit, Lisa Vallely, Sheena McCormack, Robert Pool, Richard J Hayes, the Microbicides Development Programme (MDP) |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,934,253
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#647
of 1,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,488
of 98,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them