You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No evidence of differential effects of SFA, MUFA or PUFA on post-ingestive satiety and energy intake: a randomised trial of fatty acid saturation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-9-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline M Strik, Fiona E Lithander, Anne-Thea McGill, Alastair K MacGibbon, Brian H McArdle, Sally D Poppitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,805,539
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#612
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,181
of 102,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.