↓ Skip to main content

Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-3-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tari Turner, Marie Misso, Claire Harris, Sally Green

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Canada 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Peru 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 140 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Lecturer 11 7%
Other 49 31%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 49%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,247
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,478
of 91,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.