↓ Skip to main content

Males benefit more from cold water immersion during repeated handgrip contractions than females despite similar oxygen kinetics

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Males benefit more from cold water immersion during repeated handgrip contractions than females despite similar oxygen kinetics
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12576-020-00742-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiří Baláš, Jan Kodejška, Dominika Krupková, David Giles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 25 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 25 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,590,747
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#128
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,464
of 364,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.