You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-13-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ray Greek, Annalea Pippus, Lawrence A Hansen |
| Abstract |
The requirement that animals be used in research and testing in order to protect humans was formalized in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent national and international laws, codes, and declarations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 327 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 77 | 24% |
| United States | 34 | 10% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 182 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 305 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Scientists | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 25% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#133,426
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#4
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#568
of 178,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them