↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of scientific collaboration in Chinese psychiatry research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of scientific collaboration in Chinese psychiatry research
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0870-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Wu, Xing Jin

Abstract

In recent decades, China has changed profoundly, becoming the country with the world's second-largest economy. The proportion of the Chinese population suffering from mental disorder has grown in parallel with the rapid economic development, as social stresses have increased. The aim of this study is to shed light on the status of collaborations in the Chinese psychiatry field, of which there is currently limited research. We sampled 16,224 publications (2003-2012) from 10 core psychiatry journals from Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Database. We used various social network analysis (SNA) methods such as centrality analysis, and Core-Periphery analysis to study collaboration. We also used hierarchical clustering analysis in this study. From 2003-2012, there were increasing collaborations at the level of authors, institutions and regions in the Chinese psychiatry field. Geographically, these collaborations were distributed unevenly. The 100 most prolific authors and institutions and 32 regions were used to construct the collaboration map, from which we detected the core author, institution and region. Collaborative behavior was affected by economic development. We should encourage collaborative behavior in the Chinese psychiatry field, as this facilitates knowledge distribution, resource sharing and information acquisition. Collaboration has also helped the field narrow its current research focus, providing further evidence to inform policymakers to fund research in order to tackle the increase in mental disorder facing modern China.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%