↓ Skip to main content

Occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults: A protocol for a randomised trial and economic evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults: A protocol for a randomised trial and economic evaluation
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-12-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie Wales, Lindy Clemson, Natasha A Lannin, Ian D Cameron, Glenn Salked, Laura Gitlin, Laurance Rubenstein, Sarah Barras, Lynette Mackenzie, Collette Davies

Abstract

Decreased functional ability is common in older adults after hospitalisation. Lower levels of functional ability increase the risk of hospital readmission and nursing care facility admission. Discharge planning across the hospital and community interface is suggested to increase functional ability and decrease hospital length of stay and hospital readmission. However evidence is limited and the benefits of occupational therapists providing this service has not been investigated.This randomised trial will investigate the clinical effectiveness of a discharge planning program in reducing functional difficulties of older adults post-discharge. This trial will also examine the cost of the intervention and cost effectiveness when compared to in-hospital discharge planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 18%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 53 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Psychology 11 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 59 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,079,052
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,703
of 3,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,921
of 165,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.