↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary tuberculosis diagnostic delays in Chad: a multicenter, hospital-based survey in Ndjamena and Moundou

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary tuberculosis diagnostic delays in Chad: a multicenter, hospital-based survey in Ndjamena and Moundou
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ndeindo Ndeikoundam Ngangro, Doudeadoum Ngarhounoum, Mosurel N Ngangro, Ngakoutou Rangar, Mahinda G Siriwardana, Virginie Halley des Fontaines, Pierre Chauvin

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in low-resource countries. One contagious patient can infect 10 to 20 contacts in these settings. Delays in diagnosing TB therefore contribute to the spread of the disease and sustain the epidemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,357,476
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,737
of 14,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,485
of 164,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#140
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.