↓ Skip to main content

How to use and assess qualitative research methods

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 235)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
82 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
511 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4719 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,719 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4719 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 487 10%
Student > Bachelor 340 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 272 6%
Lecturer 195 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 155 3%
Other 555 12%
Unknown 2715 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 286 6%
Social Sciences 282 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 247 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 168 4%
Unspecified 126 3%
Other 821 17%
Unknown 2789 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#511,751
of 26,784,510 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#5
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,477
of 434,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,784,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them