↓ Skip to main content

How to use and assess qualitative research methods

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 223)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
74 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3538 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3538 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 419 12%
Student > Bachelor 290 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 238 7%
Unspecified 157 4%
Lecturer 141 4%
Other 461 13%
Unknown 1832 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 235 7%
Social Sciences 224 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 203 6%
Unspecified 157 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 138 4%
Other 681 19%
Unknown 1900 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#498,396
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#6
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,804
of 401,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.