↓ Skip to main content

How to use and assess qualitative research methods

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 168)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1308 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 216 17%
Student > Bachelor 126 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 8%
Unspecified 88 7%
Student > Postgraduate 62 5%
Other 211 16%
Unknown 501 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 115 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 109 8%
Social Sciences 109 8%
Unspecified 88 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 4%
Other 302 23%
Unknown 527 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#658,608
of 21,774,582 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#6
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,658
of 306,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,774,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them