You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Translation method is validity evidence for construct equivalence: analysis of secondary data routinely collected during translations of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00962-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Hawkins, Christina Cheng, Gerald R. Elsworth, Richard H. Osborne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,359,982
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#879
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,083
of 430,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#48
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.