You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How effective are digital interventions in increasing flu vaccination amongst pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01372-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanne Parsons, Helen Atherton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,543,801
of 24,955,994 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#440
of 2,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,071
of 401,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,955,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.