↓ Skip to main content

A guideline for analyzing circadian wheel-running behavior in rodents under different lighting conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 195)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A guideline for analyzing circadian wheel-running behavior in rodents under different lighting conditions
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, July 2005
DOI 10.1251/bpo109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne Jud, Isabelle Schmutz, Gabriele Hampp, Henrik Oster, Urs Albrecht

Abstract

Most behavioral experiments within circadian research are based on the analysis of locomotor activity. This paper introduces scientists to chronobiology by explaining the basic terminology used within the field. Furthermore, it aims to assist in designing, carrying out, and evaluating wheel-running experiments with rodents, particularly mice. Since light is an easily applicable stimulus that provokes strong effects on clock phase, the paper focuses on the application of different lighting conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 292 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 27%
Researcher 52 17%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Professor 20 6%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 43 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 37%
Neuroscience 50 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,283,153
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#9
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,766
of 70,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them