You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A guideline for analyzing circadian wheel-running behavior in rodents under different lighting conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Procedures Online, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1251/bpo109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Corinne Jud, Isabelle Schmutz, Gabriele Hampp, Henrik Oster, Urs Albrecht |
Abstract |
Most behavioral experiments within circadian research are based on the analysis of locomotor activity. This paper introduces scientists to chronobiology by explaining the basic terminology used within the field. Furthermore, it aims to assist in designing, carrying out, and evaluating wheel-running experiments with rodents, particularly mice. Since light is an easily applicable stimulus that provokes strong effects on clock phase, the paper focuses on the application of different lighting conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 292 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 27% |
Researcher | 52 | 17% |
Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
Professor | 20 | 6% |
Other | 55 | 18% |
Unknown | 43 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 37% |
Neuroscience | 50 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 6% |
Psychology | 12 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 9% |
Unknown | 51 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,283,153
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#9
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,766
of 70,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them