↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic plasma exchange as a routine therapy in septic shock and as an experimental treatment for COVID-19: we are not sure

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Therapeutic plasma exchange as a routine therapy in septic shock and as an experimental treatment for COVID-19: we are not sure
Published in
Critical Care, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02943-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick M. Honore, Aude Mugisha, Luc Kugener, Sebastien Redant, Rachid Attou, Andrea Gallerani, David De Bels

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Librarian 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,268,461
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,317
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,846
of 421,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#144
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.