You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enablers and barriers of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain for engaging in telehealth interventions: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01390-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lívia G. Fernandes, Hemakumar Devan, Steven J. Kamper, Christopher M. Williams, Bruno T. Saragiotto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,559,302
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#661
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,484
of 402,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.