↓ Skip to main content

How machine learning could be used in clinical practice during an epidemic

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
How machine learning could be used in clinical practice during an epidemic
Published in
Critical Care, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02962-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Verdonk, Franck Verdonk, Gérard Dreyfus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Engineering 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,876
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,230
of 429,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#197
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.