↓ Skip to main content

Female urinary incontinence and wellbeing: results from a multi-national survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Female urinary incontinence and wellbeing: results from a multi-national survey
Published in
BMC Urology, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12894-016-0140-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew P. Smith

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the severity of symptoms of urinary incontinence impacts on quality of life and wellbeing. The aim of this article is to investigate the relationship between female urinary incontinence and mental wellbeing. This involved analyses comparing those with UI and those without to determine whether any differences in wellbeing were modified by demographic factors, specific wellbeing domain, or exercise and frequency of sex. Following this, further analyses compared sub-groups of those with UI (based on the impact of the UI) to determine which characteristics were important in influencing wellbeing. An internet survey of women with UI, aged between 45 and 60 years, has been previously reported and this article reports secondary analyses of that data. A sample from 4 countries: the UK, France, Germany and the USA. Two thousand four hundred three women completed the survey, 1203 with UI and 1200 who did not report UI. The main outcome measures were the scores from the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). The results showed that lower wellbeing is observed in UI. This effect is observed in all aspects of wellbeing and most sub-groups of UI sufferers. Lifestyle influences wellbeing and those with UI who exercise less frequently or have sex infrequently are especially likely to report lower wellbeing. Wellbeing decreases as a function of the indirect measures of severity of UI and reductions in HRQol. Again, these changes reflect all aspects of wellbeing measured by WEMWBS. The results show that women with UI, aged 45-60 years, report lower wellbeing. This effect was not modified by demographic factors and was apparent in most of the domains measured by the WEMWBS. The reduced wellbeing was related to the impact of the UI on behaviour, embarrassment associated with it, and frequency of leakage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Psychology 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,896,711
of 16,251,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#92
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,735
of 269,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,251,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them