| Title |
Thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a French monocenter retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03025-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Fraissé, Elsa Logre, Olivier Pajot, Hervé Mentec, Gaëtan Plantefève, Damien Contou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 17% |
| Spain | 5 | 12% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,577,802
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,384
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,736
of 433,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.