You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01010-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abimbola A. Ayorinde, Iestyn Williams, Russell Mannion, Fujian Song, Magdalena Skrybant, Richard J. Lilford, Yen-Fu Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 45% |
| India | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Scientists | 8 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,783,934
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#416
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,953
of 435,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#23
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.