You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
e-Health interventions for healthy aging: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01385-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald Buyl, Idrissa Beogo, Maaike Fobelets, Carole Deletroz, Philip Van Landuyt, Samantha Dequanter, Ellen Gorus, Anne Bourbonnais, Anik Giguère, Kathleen Lechasseur, Marie-Pierre Gagnon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 93 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 105 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,979,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,522
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,977
of 435,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#52
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.