↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of illness perceptions and beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life of patients with coronary artery disease and their caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of illness perceptions and beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life of patients with coronary artery disease and their caregivers
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12955-020-01405-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Thomson, Neil J. Angus, Federico Andreis, Gordon F. Rushworth, Andrea R. Mohan, Misook L. Chung, Stephen J. Leslie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,484,106
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,183
of 2,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,453
of 395,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#47
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.