The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04335-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lila J. Finney Rutten, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Linda L. Chlan, Joan M. Griffin, Jeph Herrin, Aaron L. Leppin, Deirdre R. Pachman, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Parvez A. Rahman, Curtis B. Storlie, Patrick M. Wilson, Andrea L. Cheville |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 6% |
Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 79 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 9% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 83 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,403,099
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#463
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,461
of 435,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.