| Title |
ECMO use in COVID-19: lessons from past respiratory virus outbreaks—a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02979-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hwa Jin Cho, Silver Heinsar, In Seok Jeong, Kiran Shekar, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Jae Seung Jung, Jacky Y. Suen, John F. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 23% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#913,311
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#693
of 6,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,545
of 433,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.