↓ Skip to main content

The Majority of Dorsal Spinal Cord Gastrin Releasing Peptide is Synthesized Locally Whereas Neuromedin B is Highly Expressed in Pain- and Itch-Sensing Somatosensory Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 669)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Majority of Dorsal Spinal Cord Gastrin Releasing Peptide is Synthesized Locally Whereas Neuromedin B is Highly Expressed in Pain- and Itch-Sensing Somatosensory Neurons
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-8-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S Fleming, Daniel Ramos, Seung Baek Han, Jianyuan Zhao, Young-Jin Son, Wenqin Luo

Abstract

Itch is one of the major somatosensory modalities. Some recent findings have proposed that gastrin releasing peptide (Grp) is expressed in a subset of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and functions as a selective neurotransmitter for transferring itch information to spinal cord interneurons. However, expression data from public databases and earlier literatures indicate that Grp mRNA is only detected in dorsal spinal cord (dSC) whereas its family member neuromedin B (Nmb) is highly expressed in DRG neurons. These contradictory results argue that a thorough characterization of the expression of Grp and Nmb is warranted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 30%
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,222,285
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#48
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,287
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.