You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Women’s, partners’ and healthcare providers’ views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-020-00915-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Crossland, Carol Kingdon, Marie-Clare Balaam, Ana Pilar Betrán, Soo Downe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Serbia | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,770,966
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#297
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,655
of 404,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.