You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Repurposing NGO data for better research outcomes: a scoping review of the use and secondary analysis of NGO data in health policy and systems research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00577-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah C. Masefield, Alice Megaw, Matt Barlow, Piran C. L. White, Henrice Altink, Jean Grugel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Senegal | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 65 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,662,507
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#614
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,032
of 398,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#29
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.