You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The reliability and feasibility of non-contrast adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping in patients on haemodialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00634-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federica E Poli, Gaurav S Gulsin, Daniel S March, Ahmed MSEK Abdelaty, Kelly S Parke, Joanne V Wormleighton, Gerry P McCann, James O Burton, Matthew PM Graham-Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,303,142
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#180
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,438
of 434,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.