You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Imaging, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Beyer, Luc Bidaut, John Dickson, Marc Kachelriess, Fabian Kiessling, Rainer Leitgeb, Jingfei Ma, Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar, Benjamin Theek, Osama Mawlawi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 70 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#320
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,415
of 433,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.