↓ Skip to main content

Health promotion lifestyle interventions for weight management in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health promotion lifestyle interventions for weight management in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Bonfioli, Loretta Berti, Claudia Goss, Francesca Muraro, Lorenzo Burti

Abstract

Psychiatric patients have more physical health problems and much shorter life expectancies compared to the general population, due primarily to premature cardiovascular disease. A multi-causal model which includes a higher prevalence of risk factors has provided a valid explanation. It takes into consideration not only risks such as gender, age, and family history that are inherently non-modifiable, but also those such as obesity, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia that are modifiable through behavioural changes and improved care. Thus, it is crucial to focus on factors that increase cardiovascular risk. Obesity in particular has been associated with both the lifestyle habits and the side effects of antipsychotic medications. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims at collecting and updating available evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological health promotion programmes for psychotic patients in randomised clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 312 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 82 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 22%
Psychology 44 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 102 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,440,985
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,737
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,267
of 178,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#33
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.