Title |
Is the tide turning against breast screening?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/bcr3212 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karsten Juhl Jørgensen |
Abstract |
ABSTRACT: Herein I argue that mammographic screening has not delivered on its fundamental premise: to reduce the incidence of advanced breast cancer. Indeed, achieving this goal is required if screening is to reduce breast cancer mortality or mastectomy use. Rather, screening has caused substantial increases in the incidence of in situ and early invasive cancers. Moreover, evidence indicates that these screen-detected cancers are unlikely to be cases that were 'caught early', but instead represent women who would not have been diagnosed in the absence of screening and who, as a result, have received harmful, unnecessary treatment. If true, these observations raise the specter that screening creates breast cancer patients and that this practice carries little or no benefit. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Professor | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
Librarian | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 24% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 48% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |