You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A structured review of reasons for ecstasy use and related behaviours: pointers for future research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters, Gerjo Kok |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,878
of 14,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,152
of 110,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.