You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enhancing quality of life in older adults: A comparison of muscular strength and power training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-6-45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey A Katula, W Jack Rejeski, Anthony P Marsh |
Abstract |
Although progressive resistance strength training (ST) has been found to improve various measures of physical functioning in older adults, the benefit to quality of life is unclear. Additionally, recent evidence suggests that high velocity power training (PT) may be more beneficial for physical functioning than ST, but it is not known whether this type of training impacts quality of life. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in multiple measures of quality of life resulting from ST vs. PT in older adults. A no exercise group was also included as control comparison condition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 265 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
Researcher | 19 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
Other | 56 | 21% |
Unknown | 64 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 61 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 12% |
Psychology | 18 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Other | 41 | 15% |
Unknown | 75 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#914
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,132
of 96,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.