↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing quality of life in older adults: A comparison of muscular strength and power training

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing quality of life in older adults: A comparison of muscular strength and power training
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-6-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey A Katula, W Jack Rejeski, Anthony P Marsh

Abstract

Although progressive resistance strength training (ST) has been found to improve various measures of physical functioning in older adults, the benefit to quality of life is unclear. Additionally, recent evidence suggests that high velocity power training (PT) may be more beneficial for physical functioning than ST, but it is not known whether this type of training impacts quality of life. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in multiple measures of quality of life resulting from ST vs. PT in older adults. A no exercise group was also included as control comparison condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 64 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 61 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Psychology 18 7%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 75 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#914
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,132
of 96,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.